Skip to content

Gamifying Rehab: VR-Based Priming to Enhance Motor Sequence Learning in the Early Phase After Ischemic Stroke

Gamifying Rehab: VR-Based Priming to Enhance Motor Sequence Learning in the Early Phase After Ischemic Stroke - Gamifying Rehab

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00040300
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-05-12
Start date
2025-06-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rehab after stroke post-stroke-patients

Interventions

Group 1: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled intervention study being conducted at the Stroke Unit of Jena University Hospital. After receiving informed consent, eligible pat

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Jena
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
55 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 55 to 85 years with a first acute ischemic infarction in the middle cerebral artery territory in the early post-stroke phase. Eligible patients must be able to provide informed consent and be treated in the stroke unit or early neurorehabilitation setting. Patients should have mild to moderate motor impairment of the upper extremity, defined as arm paresis with a muscle strength grade of 4–5, an NIHSS upper-extremity motor score of no more than 2 points, a total NIHSS score = 6, and an mRS = 3. Study participation takes place between day 1 and day 10 after stroke. Patients should have comparable motor impairment and receive comparable physiotherapy and occupational therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients are excluded in case of current or previous depression, current depressive symptoms with a BDI score > 10, dementia or cognitive impairment with a MoCA score = 22, aphasia or apraxia, relevant visual impairment > 3 diopters, or pronounced motion sickness. Patients unable to provide informed consent or patients under legal guardianship are not eligible for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
What / Outcome: The primary outcome is sequence-specific performance in the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) at the block level. It is operationalized as the reaction time difference between structured and randomized blocks. Reaction times from correct trials will be analyzed, recorded in milliseconds and log-transformed if appropriate. Estimand / Hypothesis: The primary analysis will test whether the change in sequence-specific performance from day 1 to day 2 differs between the intervention and control groups. Formally, this corresponds to the group × day × condition interaction in the block-based model, with condition representing structured versus randomized blocks. This three-way interaction constitutes the primary endpoint test and assesses whether the development of sequence expression over time differs between groups. Time points: Day 1 and day 2, corresponding to two consecutive training days. Analysis: The analysis will be performed using a mixed-effects model at the block level, with log-transformed reaction time as the dependent variable. Fixed effects will include group, day, condition, block number, and the relevant interactions. The model will be adjusted a priori for age, motor impairment, for example S-FMA, and cognitive function, for example MoCA. A random intercept for each participant will be included. The primary test will be the significance of the group × day × condition interaction. In addition, pre-specified contrasts, for example estimated marginal means, will be used to quantify the sequence-specific benefit within each group and its change from day 1 to day 2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Confirmation of the sequence-learning signature As a key secondary outcome, we will assess whether the expected sequence-learning signal can be detected in the SRTT. For this purpose, we will analyze whether structured blocks are performed faster than randomized blocks. 2. Speed–accuracy coupling In addition, the relationship between reaction time and error measures will be examined, for example using the block-wise error rate. We will assess whether the association between reaction time and errors differs between the intervention and control groups. 3. Motivation and reward-related experience Motivation and reward-related experience will be assessed using the MORE score on day 1 and day 2. The intervention and control groups will be compared with regard to overall levels and changes over time. 4. Subjective experience of the VR application In the intervention group, a VR-specific post-intervention questionnaire will additionally be administered on day 2 to assess subjective experience, acceptability, and tolerability of the VR application. This outcome will be analyzed descriptively. Time points: Baseline / day 1 and follow-up / day 2. The VR-specific post-intervention questionnaire will be administered exclusively on day 2 and only in the intervention group.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactFranziska Wagner

Universitätsklinikum Jena

franziska.wagner@med.uni-jean.de+4936419323484

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026