Status post in-house treatment with cheilectomy and RegJoint™ implantation for hallux rigidus M20.2
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Retrospective analysis of all patients with a history of in-house treatment involving cheilectomy and RegJoint™ implantation for hallux rigidus during the period 01/2018–12/2023 with prospect
Sponsors
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Universitätsklinik fu¨r Orthopädie im Pius-Hospital
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Status post in-house treatment with cheilectomy and RegJoint™ implantation for hallux rigidus between 01/2018 and 12/2023 2. Age = 18 years 3. Minimum follow-up period of 12 months
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Neuromuscular diseases 2. Ipsilateral and simultaneous arthrodesis proximal to the tarsometatarsal joint line
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint is implant survival. Non-survival is defined as removal of the RegJoint™ or conversion to MTP I arthrodesis. Status post in-house treatment with cheilectomy and RegJoint™ implantation for hallux rigidus during the period 01/2018–12/2023 Data collection includes: - Recording of sociodemographic data - Clinical examination of both feet - Patient-reported questionnaires (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS], EQ-5D-5L, Numeric Pain Scale [NRS] for pain assessment, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score [AOFAS score], University of California Los Angeles Activity Score [UCLA score], European Foot and Ankle Society [EFAS] score) - Extraction of clinical data (complications/adverse events) from electronic medical records and operative reports - Patient-reported information on revisions performed outside the institution and any complications/adverse events - Pedobarography to assess peak plantar pressures and mean plantar pressures (N/cm²) - Radiographs, if applicable | — |
Countries
Germany
Outcome results
None listed