The subject of this study is not a disease-related condition, but an organizational and health care–related problem within the nursing context. The study investigates the implementation and use of the knowledge-transfer format One Minute Wonder (OMW) in clinical nursing practice at the university hospitals of Ruhr University Bochum (RUB).
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: The aim of this study is to determine the extent to which nursing staff use OMW as a training method in practice and how they rate it. One Minute Wonder (OMW) modules, with their condensed co
Sponsors
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum Medizinische Fakultät OWL (Universität Bielefeld)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Affiliation with a nursing profession at one of the university hospitals of Ruhr University Bochum, including registered nurses, nursing assistants, nursing trainees, and nursing students Employment or placement in a ward with inpatient beds or in a functional department of the participating hospitals Willingness to participate voluntarily in the written questionnaire and/or focus group interviews
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Observers, interns, temporary staff working fewer than 3 days on the ward, international nursing students completing their training, and all records of individuals who answered fewer than 50% of the questions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The study examines the following primary and secondary outcomes: The primary objective of this study is to determine the extent to which nursing staff use OMW as a training method in practice and how they evaluate it. Secondary objectives include subjective learning gains, administrative conditions, and factors that hinder or facilitate the implementation of OMW. The primary and secondary outcomes are collected using a specially developed standardized written questionnaire. Data on the use of OMW in the respective setting, along with sociodemographic information, are collected. A cognitive interview is conducted before the developed questionnaire is used in the study. If necessary, a written validation is performed as a supplement. Factors that hinder or promote the implementation of OMW are identified through focus group interviews. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The secondary outcome parameters are operationalized as follows: a) Subjective educational benefit is assessed using a 6-point scale (1 = maximum educational benefit). b) Administrative and organizational framework conditions are assessed using multiple-choice questions. c) Additional educational opportunities are assessed using multiple-choice questions. d) Willingness to create OMWs is assessed based on the number of OMWs previously created by the participants. e) Evaluation of OMW as a continuing education method is assessed using a 6-point scale (1 = very good). f) Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of OMW are assessed both within the questionnaire and through focus group interviews. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactFiola Przybylski
Katholisches Klinikum Bochum
Outcome results
None listed