Skip to content

Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional implantation techniques in total knee arthroplasty using the VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution

Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional implantation techniques in total knee arthroplasty using the VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution - VELYS Knee Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00040020
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-04-21
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary knee osteoarthritis with indication for primary total knee arthroplasty M17.0

Interventions

Group 1: Robotic-assisted mechanical alignment (RA-MA): Primary total knee arthroplasty using the VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution with mechanical alignment
operative strategy: tibia-first. Group 2: Robotic-assisted kinematic alignment (RA-KA): Primary total knee arthroplasty using the VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution with kinematic alignment
operative strategy: femur-first. Group 3: Manual mechanical alignment (MA): Primary total knee arthroplasty using conventional manual instrumentation with mechanical alignment according to established
operative strategy: tibia-first.

Sponsors

St. Marienkrankenhaus Ludwigshafen, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Primary knee osteoarthritis with indication for primary total knee arthroplasty; capacity to consent and written informed consent; willingness and ability to complete patient-reported outcome assessments; availability of routine preoperative imaging.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Revision procedures, unicompartmental or simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty; active infection, tumor disease, or recent fracture; inflammatory rheumatic systemic disease; pregnancy or breastfeeding; insufficient German language skills, inability to consent, or lack of follow-up reachability.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oxford Knee Score (OKS); assessed at 12 months postoperatively; data collection by OKS questionnaire;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 3 and 24 months; Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 12 and 24 months; EQ-5D-5L preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months; knee range of motion (ROM) at 3 months during routine clinical follow-up. Radiographic: mHKA/HKA, MAD, and aFTA/FTA; assessed preoperatively within = 3 months before surgery and postoperatively within = 6 weeks after surgery using routine standing AP long-leg radiographs, with standardized SOP-based measurement. Perioperative / care-related: operative time, soft-tissue release (yes/no), and length of stay (LOS). PROMs (OKS, FJS-12, EQ-5D-5L) are collected using standardized questionnaires; ROM is assessed clinically, radiographic parameters are derived from routine imaging, and perioperative care parameters are obtained from routine clinical documentation.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactJohannes Stöve

St. Marienkrankenhaus Ludwigshafen, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

orthopaedie@st-marienkrankenhaus.de+49 621/5501-2172

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026