Skip to content

The effects of various fascial interventions on myofascial structures and pathopsychological processes in depression

The effects of various fascial interventions on myofascial structures and pathopsychological processes in depression - -

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00039556
Enrollment
240
Registered
2026-04-28
Start date
2024-05-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F32.0 F32.1 F32.2

Interventions

Group 1: n= 120 adult, inpatient patients with a diagnosis of "Depressive Disorder" This cohort will be randomly divided into three groups for the following interventions: Fascial Intervention 1 "Foa

Sponsors

Universität Witten/Herdecke
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Only inpatient patients with a minimum score of 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) will be admitted to the depressive group. Only participants with a maximum score of 13 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) will be admitted to the healthy control group.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Depressive Group: psychotic disorders, bipolar disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic back pain Healthy Control Group: musculoskeletal disorders and chronic back pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is the stiffness level of the myofascial tissue, measured using a tissue compliance measurement device (IndentoPro) before and after the single intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of psychophysiological stress parameters (including electrodermal activity, heart rate, blood volume pulse, heart rate variability, etc.) using a bio- and neurofeedback device (Nexus 10, Biotrace+) before and after the intervention. Self-referential encoding task (SRET; Ramel et al., 2007; adjective list with 10 positive and 10 negative words taken from Williams & Broadbent, 1986) to measure negative memory bias, conducted between the two rounds of interventions and immediately afterward. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988; German version by Krohne et al., 1996) to assess affects after the intervention. Evaluation of credibility and pain after the intervention: To evaluate the credibility of the interventions, study participants will be asked after their completion how logical this intervention seems to them at that moment. They will rate this question on a scale from 1 (not logical at all) to 9 (very logical). Similarly, study participants will retrospectively rate the pain caused by the intervention on a scale from 1 = "no pain at all" to 9 = "very severe pain."

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMarcus Müller

Pädagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe

mueller03@ph-karlsruhe.de+4915253155028

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026