Skip to content

Comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with digitally and conventionally manufactured total dentures

Comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with digitally and conventionally manufactured total dentures - TO/TU

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00039355
Enrollment
15
Registered
2026-02-18
Start date
2016-11-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Two differently manufactured total prostheses were compared.

Interventions

Group 1: Participants initially receive conventionally fabricated maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. The clinical workflow includes preliminary impressions, fabrication of custom trays, funct

Sponsors

Ivoclar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Toothless upper and lower jaw; consent form signed; of legal age; sufficient alveolar ridge

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded from participating in the study if one or more of the following criteria apply: Partial dentition in the upper or lower jaw Missing or revoked declaration of consent Minors Insufficient alveolar ridge for stable mucosa-supported full dentures Known intolerances or allergies to dental materials used

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oral health-related quality of life

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
A secondary endpoint is the objective clinician-rated overall denture quality (e.g., fit, retention, static and dynamic occlusion, stability, esthetics, phonetics) assessed after the predefined wearing period.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactFlorian Beuer

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin

florian.beuer@charite.de+4930450562702

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026