Skip to content

Effects of Cognitive Training in HemOdialysis Patients – The ECHO Study

Effects of Cognitive Training in HemOdialysis Patients – The ECHO Study - Echo-Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00039245
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-03-20
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

N18.5

Interventions

Group 1: First, cognitive performance is assessed at a baseline time point within the first two hours of dialysis. In addition, central and transcranial blood pressure are measured at this time point

Sponsors

Justus Liebig Universität
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: · Patients over the age of 18 · Patients with end-stage renal failure receiving hemodialysis therapy · Informed consent · Agreement to undergo further neuropsychological testing during the course of the study, e.g., after 3 months and 1 year · German as native language (as the neuropsychological testing and training are language-dependent).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: · Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disorders (in particular, history of cerebral infarction, traumatic brain injury, manifest depression, or dementia) that could impair neuropsychological testing. · Patients who are under legal guardianship · Patients who are unable to understand the patient information or who are unable to cooperate mentally due to their general state of health · Insufficient knowledge of the German language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Is the neuropsychological outcome influenced by cognitive training (CT)? The question of cognitive performance change is determined a priori in a one-sided manner. Specifically, the following directed hypothesis is to be tested: H0: Under covariance of the preoperative mean z-values, the post-intervention mean z-values of the intervention group (immediately following training) are above the post-intervention mean z-values of the control group. H1: Under covariance of the preoperative mean z-values (postoperative, before training), the postoperative mean z-values of the intervention group (immediately after training) are below/equal to the postoperative mean z-values of the control group. 2. If the training program has a positive effect on the neuropsychological outcome immediately after the intervention, is this effect still detectable 3 months after the operation?

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Are only specific cognitive functions affected by the training effect? • Do the risk factors described in Anglo-American literature, such as age, gender, dialysis duration, Kt/V (as a measure of dialysis quality), underlying disease, hypertension, and sleep apnea, interact with the cognitive performance of the patient group examined in Giessen? • Do biochemically recorded parameters of disease-specific comorbidities (anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, uremic acidosis, vitamin D deficiency, aluminum levels) interact with the degree of cognitive impairment? • Does the measurement of central blood pressure correlate with possible fluctuations in the measurement of cerebral perfusion?

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactHristos Karakizlis

Justus Liebig Universität Gießen

hristos.karakizlis@innere.med.uni-giessen.de004964198557944

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026