Skip to content

Evaluation des Demonstrators im Projekt ILLUMINATION (Privacy-Preserving Usage of Large Language Models in Healthcare Applications)

Evaluation des Demonstrators im Projekt ILLUMINATION (Privacy-Preserving Usage of Large Language Models in Healthcare Applications) - ILLUMINATION

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00039125
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-02-19
Start date
2026-04-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

This study does not investigate diseases. It is about patients who visit the emergency room due to various complaints.

Interventions

Group 1: Exploratory qualitative individual interviews with adult emergency department patients (MTS categories 3–5, triage indicator “Unwell adult”) to identify requirements, expectations, facilitati

Sponsors

CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security (CISPA)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Triage category 3–5 and MTS-indicator „Unwell Adult“ - Patient has not yet been in contact with the treating physician for his or her ED visit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Incapable of giving consent (e.g., due to acute cognitive impairment, disturbance of consciousness, intoxication) - Medical transport or admission by emergency services or doctor's office - Insufficient German language skills for information and consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of the study is the patients’ subjective experience associated with the use of the digital demonstrator during waiting time in the emergency department. Specifically, the following aspects are assessed: Self-reflection on one’s own health status (based on TSRI), and perceived patient empowerment during waiting time (PEN-13). Data collection takes place during the quantitative evaluation phase (study phase 3).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Subjective preparation for the medical consultation, assessed using open-ended questions inspired by patient-reported outcome measures (e.g. PROM-ED) - Understanding of emergency department processes, captured through structured open-ended questions - User acceptance and evaluation of the demonstrator, defined as the proportion of patients rating the tool as comprehensible, helpful, and meaningful (using UEQ-10, AttractDiff) - Assessment of information quality and potential clinical usefulness of the structured patient inputs from the perspective of physicians and nursing staff (qualitative evaluation in study phase 4)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactYves Noel Wu

Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Notaufnahmen Campus Mitte und Campus Virchow Klinikum, Notfallmedizinische Versorgungsforschung

yves-noel.wu@charite.de+4930450553207

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026