Skip to content

Comparative study regarding the efficiency of different technologies for the intraoperative elimination of surgical smoke during body contouring surgery

Comparative study regarding the efficiency of different technologies for the intraoperative elimination of surgical smoke during body contouring surgery - SP (surgical plumb) study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00038933
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-01-13
Start date
2025-05-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

surgical plumb in OR

Interventions

Group 1: The aim of this study is to transfer and verify the findings obtained from ex vivo, in vivo, and routine clinical practice to open electrosurgery. Body contouring surgery, also known as recon

Sponsors

St. Martinus Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients over 18 years of age for whom body contouring surgery is indicated due to massive weight loss. Patients scheduled for breast/thorax lift, abdominoplasty (also known as fleur-de-lis lift) will be included. Consent to study participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lack of consent to study participation. Otherwise, there are no preoperative exclusion criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary endpoint: Intraoperative surgical smoke particle concentration (particle number concentration [1/cm³]) and intraoperative intra-abdominal particle release rate (particle release rate [1/sec]). The gas fraction includes carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, ozone, and particulate matter detectors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoint: Assessment of intraoperative smoke exposure by the two surgeons (Likert scale: 1–5), olfactory annoyance from smoke by the two surgeons (Likert scale: 1–5), acoustic annoyance from the elimination technique by the two surgeons (Likert scale: 1–5), other interferences of the surgery with the technology used, and the duration of the operation for all 20 patients.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactCédric R. D. Demtröder

St. Martinus Krankenhaus Düsseldorf

c.demtroeder@martinus-duesseldorf.de+492119171458

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026