Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Analgesia Administered by Paramedics: A Prospective Observational Study in the Offenbach District EMS System

Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Analgesia Administered by Paramedics: A Prospective Observational Study in the Offenbach District EMS System

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00038907
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-01-08
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The study investigates acute pain in adult patients treated by emergency medical services and evaluates how effective and safe pain treatment initiated during routine prehospital care is under real-world conditions.

Interventions

Group 1: Adult emergency patients (=18 years) in the Offenbach district EMS system for whom, during routine care, paramedics initially initiated intravenous analgesia with morphine or paracetamol. No
treatment follows standard routine care.

Sponsors

HSD Hochschule Döpfer University of Applied Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Mission within the routine EMS system in the Offenbach district EMS area Acute pain requiring pain treatment Patient consent to receive pain treatment Initial start of intravenous pain treatment by paramedics with morphine or paracetamol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Initial pain treatment provided by an emergency physician (subsequent physician attendance is not an exclusion but will be documented) Missing pain ratings on the numeric pain rating scale (0–10) Presence of a contraindication to the administered drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain reduction (?NRS, 0–10) between start of analgesia (first administration of morphine or paracetamol) and clinical handover. Assessment: NRS values documented by the EMS crew as part of routine care; anonymised capture of both NRS time points post-mission via a standardised online questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety: Occurrence, type and frequency of adverse events up to clinical handover (e.g., nausea/vomiting, reduced level of consciousness/sedation, hypotension, decrease in oxygen saturation, bradycardia/tachycardia) and any required countermeasures. Assessment: Events, vital signs and actions are documented during routine care and anonymised post-mission via the standardised online questionnaire.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThomas Hofmann

HSD Hochschule Döpfer University of Applied Sciences

t.hofmann@hs-doepfer.de+49 (0)331 200935 - 12

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026