Skip to content

Efficacy and modes of action of an age-sensitive telehealth group therapy to reduce clinical depression (with and without anxiety) in older adults (VISION-AGE)

Efficacy and modes of action of an age-sensitive telehealth group therapy to reduce clinical depression (with and without anxiety) in older adults (VISION-AGE) - VISION-AGE

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00038366
Enrollment
250
Registered
2025-11-13
Start date
2026-02-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F32.0 F32.1 F33.0 F33.1 F38.1 F38.8 F41.2 F43.2

Interventions

Group 1: VISION-AGE is a standardised, age-sensitive group psychotherapy programme, carried out via video conference by trained psychotherapists. Well-established life-review therapy methods are enric

Sponsors

MSB Research, Development and Innovation gGmbH (MSB-RDI)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
68 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • the person has the capacity to give informed consent, voluntarily agree to participate in the study • they are diagnosed with mild or moderate unipolar depressive symptoms associated with one of the following ICD-10 diagnoses: F32.0/1, F33.0/1, F38.1/8, F41.2 or F43.2 based on a clinical interview • they have clinically relevant depressive symptoms based on self-report • they are not taking psychoactive medications or are taking a stable dosage for at least six weeks prior to study entry • they have an indication for participation in group psychotherapy • sufficient language and communication skills in German • functioning, stable internet connection and basic IT skills

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • very severe depressive symptoms associated with one of the following ICD-10 diagnoses F32.2 or F33.2 based on the clinical interview • very severe depressive symptoms based on the self-report • very severe anxiety symptoms or symptoms of panic disorder or specific phobia that mandate in vivo exposure • acute suicidal tendencies • signs of or they have been diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment • signs of or they have been diagnosed with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia • physical illness in the terminal phase • plan to change their intake of psychoactive medications before enrolment or during the study • receiving psychotherapy while participating in the study • communication difficulties and visual or hearing impairments that would severely affect an individual’s ability to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome variable is the reduction in participants' depressive symptoms, as indicated by changes in their self-reported scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) between pre- and post-treatment and follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
As secondary outcomes, changes from baseline measurement to posttreatment and follow-up will be examined in the following concepts: • clinician-rated depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, MADRS) • anxiety symptoms (Geriatric Anxiety Scale, GAS) • psychological well-being (short version of the the Ryff, SPWB) The following concepts of self- and developmental regulation will be assessed as mediator variables at baseline, at one of the four intermediate time points, after the completion of the respective module, at post-treatment, and at follow-up: • Positive self-perceptions of ageing, fostered in Module 1, is operationalised as the inverse of the score on the self-directed ageism subscale of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Ageism Scale (translated into German by the research team and expanded by four items) • Reminiscence, fostered in Module 2, will be assessed as ego-integrity by using short version of the Northwestern Ego Integrity Scale (NEIS; translated into German by the research team) • Life management, fostered in Module 3, will be assessed using the Scale Selection Optimisation Compensation (SOC) • Future planning, fostered in Module 4, will be assessed using a modified 6-item version of the Preparation for Future Care Needs – 5-item short scale (PFC; translated into German and modified by the research team).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactEva-Marie Kessler

MSB Medical School Berlin

eva-marie.kessler@medicalschool-berlin.de+49 30 -7668375600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026