Skip to content

A randomized, ablation-based atrial fibrillation rhythm control versus rate control trial in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (CABANA-RAFT HF): A Pilot Study

A randomized, ablation-based atrial fibrillation rhythm control versus rate control trial in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (CABANA-RAFT HF): A Pilot Study - CABANA-RAFT HF

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00038264
Enrollment
84
Registered
2025-11-18
Start date
2025-11-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF)

Interventions

Group 1: Procedure/Surgery: Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Participants randomized to this arm will undergo catheter ablation within 4 weeks of randomization. Pulmonary vein isolation is re
additional ablation strategies may be applied at investigator discretion. Guideline-directed medical therapy for atrial fibrillation and heart failure will also be provided. Group 2: Drug: Rate Contro

Sponsors

QEII Health Sciences Centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (documented on Holter, rhythm strip, or ECG) - New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–III heart failure - Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% - Meet specific NT-proBNP criteria: - If HF hospitalization within 6 months prior to screening: NT-proBNP >200 pg/ml (if not in AF at screening) or >600 pg/ml (if in AF at screening) - Otherwise: NT-proBNP >300 pg/ml (if not in AF at screening) or >900 pg/ml (if in AF at screening) - On stable guideline-directed medical therapy for =1 month - On stable diuretic dose for =2 weeks - Suitable for either ablation-based rhythm control or rate control strategy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Permanent atrial fibrillation diagnosis - Prior catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation - NYHA class IV heart failure - Rheumatic heart disease - Moderate or severe mitral stenosis - Mechanical mitral valve - Severe aortic stenosis or severe aortic/mitral regurgitation - Renal failure requiring dialysis - Contraindication to oral anticoagulation - Infiltrative cardiomyopathies - Complex congenital heart disease - Untreated thyroid disease - Acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery bypass surgery within 12 weeks - Participation in another clinical trial - Inability to provide informed consent - Other serious non-cardiovascular condition with life expectancy =1 year - Age <18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome: Feasibility of Trial Conduct Assessment method: Recruitment rate (patients recruited per center per month) and crossover rate (percentage of participants switching study arms). Feasibility will be defined as =0.7 patients enrolled per center per month and =10% crossover. Timepoint: 12 months after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome [1]Composite of Cardiovascular Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization Assessment method [1]Time to first event of cardiovascular death (due to MI, sudden cardiac death, HF, stroke, CV procedures, CV bleeding, or other CV cause) or hospitalization for heart failure (admission >24h, ED visit, or unscheduled IV diuretic administration). Timepoint [1]Up to 12 months post-randomization Secondary outcome [2]Cardiovascular Hospitalizations and ED Visits (Non-HF) Assessment method [2]Number of hospitalizations or emergency department visits for other cardiovascular causes, including atrial fibrillation. Timepoint [2]Up to 12 months Secondary outcome [3]Quality of Life: EQ-5D, AFEQT, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) Assessment method [3]Change in patient-reported quality of life scores using validated instruments. Timepoint [3]Baseline, 12 months Secondary outcome [4]Atrial Fibrillation Burden Assessment method [4]Proportion of time in atrial fibrillation as measured by Holter monitoring and symptom-triggered ECG recordings Timepoint [4]Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months Secondary outcome [5]Change in NT-proBNP levels Assessment method [5]Change in plasma NT-proBNP levels from baseline to follow-up Timepoint [5]Baseline, 12 months Secondary outcome [6]Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessment method [6]Change in LVEF as measured by echocardiography Timepoint [6]Baseline, 12 months Secondary outcome [7]Exercise Capacity (6-Minute Walk Distance) Assessment method [7]Change in distance walked in 6 minutes from baseline to follow-up Timepoint [7]Baseline, 12 months Secondary outcome [8]Recruitment Metrics Assessment method [8]Recruitment ration of male vs. female participants, refusal rates and reasons. Timepoint [8]Throughout 12-month recruitment Secondary outcome [9]Procedural Complications Assessment method [9]Symptomatic pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula, pericardial effusi

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Public ContactRatika Parkash

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Ratika.Parkash@nshealth.ca+1 902 473 4474

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026