Skip to content

A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00038206
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-10-27
Start date
2024-08-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

N81.1 N81.5 N81.4 N81.6 N81.8

Interventions

Group 1: Active comparator, classical technique: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using a polypropylene mesh implant fixed to the cervix and along the entire anterior vaginal

Sponsors

Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
30 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Female patients with symptomatic isolated or combined forms of pelvic organ prolapse, corresponding to stage II–IV according to the POP-Q classification. 2) Age between 30 and 80 years. 3) Presence or absence of urinary incontinence symptoms. 4) Preoperatively verified by urodynamics: occult, mild, or severe stress urinary incontinence, or absence thereof. 5) Presence or absence of proctogenic constipation. 6) No prior surgical interventions for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. 7) History of supracervical hysterectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Severe extragenital pathology contraindicating surgical treatment. 2) Malignant pelvic pathology. 3) Asymptomatic patients. 4) Patient refusal to undergo subtotal hysterectomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Anatomical success after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Anatomical outcome will be assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Success is defined as no prolapse beyond the hymen in any vaginal compartment. Unit of Measure: POP-Q stage (0-4). Time Frame: Before and 6 months after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Functional outcome – pelvic floor symptoms. Evaluation with standardized questionnaires: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Unit of Measure: PFDI-20 score (0–300). Time Frame: Before and 6 months after surgery. 2. Sexual function. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire to assess sexual activity and satisfaction. Unit of Measure: FSFI score (2–36). Time Frame: Before and 6 months after surgery. 3. Urinary function. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) and urodynamic testing. Unit of Measure: ICIQ score (0–21); presence/absence of urodynamic abnormalities. Time Frame: Before and 6 months after surgery. 4. Postoperative complications. Frequency and severity of intraoperative and postoperative complications (classified according to Clavien-Dindo). Unit of Measure: Number of events and severity grade. Time Frame: Early (within 30 days) and late (up to 6 months) after surgery. 5. Operative time. Intraoperative. Time Frame: Minutes. 6. Length of hospital stay. From surgery until discharge. Time Frame: Days. 7. Quality of life. Assessed using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PFDI-20 global score, condition-specific questionnaires). Unit of Measure: Questionnaire scores. Time Frame: Before and 6 months after surgery.

Countries

Latvia

Contacts

Public ContactKristians Suspanovs

Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital

kristians.suspanovs@stradini.lv+37126712966

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026