Skip to content

Treatment strategies for isolated LC-1 pelvic injuries: A comparative cohort study of percutaneous posterior-only vs. combined anterior–posterior fixation

Treatment strategies for isolated LC-1 pelvic injuries: A comparative cohort study of percutaneous posterior-only vs. combined anterior–posterior fixation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00037863
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-09-16
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

S32.89

Interventions

Group 1: -Retrospective observation without modification of the clinical routine- Posterior fixation (P-Fix) alone with a least 6 months follow-up Group 2: -Retrospective observation without modificat

Sponsors

Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall und Wiederherstellugnschirurgie (Uniklinik RWTH Aachen)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Isolated LC-1 pelvic injuries -Operative treatment with percutaneous osteosynthesis -Follow-up of at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Polytrauma -Other associated musculosceletal injuries -Pathological fractures -Ruptures of the symphysis -Alternative osteosynthetic procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
-Pain Pain levels were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0–10), postoperative pain was evaluated at 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Radiological outcomes Displacement was defined a priori as >5 mm fragment dehiscence at the fracture site. Specific fracture morphology, such as oblique superior pubic rami fractures, and the zone of involvement according to the Nakatani classification were also evaluated. -Functional outcomes Mobility condition was monitored using the Surgical ICU Optimal Mobilization Score (SOMS) ranging from 0 (no mobility) to 4 (independent walking). Mobility status was further evaluated at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits, where patients were categorized into four groups: dependent mobility (wheelchair-bound or bedridden), walking with assistance (e.g., crutches or walker), walking with minimal support, and independent walking without aids or limitations. -Complications Local surgical complications comprised surgical site infections (SSI), implant loosening, and revision surgery. Systemic complications included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection (UTI), and pneumonia

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactEftychios Bolierakis

Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Uniklinik RWTH Aachen)

ebolierakis@ukaachen.de+491606249127

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026