Prospective evaluation of laser-guided navigation in interventional CT-guided pain therapy

Prospective evaluation of laser-guided navigation in interventional CT-guided pain therapy - (LaN-Eva 1)

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00037852

Enrollment

100

Registered

2025-09-04

Start date

2025-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

back pain

Interventions

Group 1: Implementation of CT-guided pain therapy using the laser navigation system "myLaserGuide" from Siemens Healthineers, which is already integrated into the phonon counting CT as a certified med

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Written informed consent from the study participant - Indication for lumbar periradicular therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients under 18 years of age - Pregnancy or other contraindications to CT or PRT - Unmanageable intolerance to iodine-containing contrast media and/or local anesthetics - Permanent anticoagulation or coagulation disorders (PTT > 50 s; Quick 38.0°C)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Accuracy (distance needle tip to planned target point)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
a) Feasibility - Comparison of the number of needle corrections - Comparison of intervention time (incision-to-suture time) - Comparison of setup time (door-to-incision time) - Comparison of complications, assessed according to the CTCAE classification - Comparison of treatment success, assessed using VAS b) Patient exposure - Comparison of the duration of fluoroscopic imaging (CT beam time) and patient exposure, based on the dose values ??documented by the CT c) Interventionalist satisfaction	—

Measure

Time frame

a) Feasibility - Comparison of the number of needle corrections - Comparison of intervention time (incision-to-suture time) - Comparison of setup time (door-to-incision time) - Comparison of complications, assessed according to the CTCAE classification - Comparison of treatment success, assessed using VAS b) Patient exposure - Comparison of the duration of fluoroscopic imaging (CT beam time) and patient exposure, based on the dose values ??documented by the CT c) Interventionalist satisfaction

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMathias Becker

Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

mathias.becker@med.ovgu.de03916713030

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026