Healthy adolescents and teachers
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Experimental group: Mini-learning "Recognizing good graphs"
Group 2: Control group: Mini-learning "Average"
Sponsors
Stiftung Gesundheitswissen
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Consent to participate in the study Sufficient knowledge of the German language In addition, for the adolescent sample only: age 14-17 years In addition, for the teacher sample only: minimum age of 18 years, currently working as a teacher in secondary school (level I or II)
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Not fulfilling the inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Subjective knowledge (self-report) on the topic of "Recognizing good graphs" | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Additional endpoints assessed before and after the intervention: - Objective knowledge (quiz score) on the topic of "Recognizing good graphs" - Two sub-scales of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), that were both adapted to the content of the mini-learnings: * sub-scale 'evaluating reliability' * sub-scale 'determining relevance' Endpoints assessed only once: - Demographic information - Subscale 'learning and value' of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) questionnaire to assess the quality of the intervention - adapted version of the Visual Aesthetics of Websites Inventory (VisAWI) adapted for e-learning to assess the attractiveness of the intervention - Questionnaire to assess the length, tempo, and difficulty of the intervention - Questionnaire on possible recommendation of the intervention to different target groups - Exclusively in the sample of teachers: questionnaire on the use in a school context - Exclusively in the sample of adolescents: questionnaire on motivation through the intervention | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactLars König
Stiftung Gesundheitswissen
Outcome results
None listed