stomatognathical healthy participants
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Examination of all study participants using
- ModJaw (ModJaw, Villeurbanne, France)
- JMA-Optic (Zebris Medical GmbH, Isny, Germany)
at a single examination appointment in randomized order.
Sponsors
UKB, Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: fixed restoration and dentition including the second molar
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Suspected TMD; severe deep bite preventing the attachment of the paraocclusal fork of the axiography system; lack of patient consent; patients with dementia or other cognitive impairments who are unable to provide informed consent for the study; pregnancy/breastfeeding; patients who do not agree to participate in the study for other reasons.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Instrumental functional analysis -Condylar range of motion (CRoM) of the right and left temporomandibular joints in mm during: - maximum jaw opening - protrusion (free, tooth-guided) - laterotrusion (free, tooth-guided) - Incisal range of motion (InRoM) in mm during: - maximum jaw opening - protrusion (free, tooth-guided) - laterotrusion (free, tooth-guided) - Articulator programming for the right and left temporomandibular joints: - sagittal condylar path inclination - Bennett angle Virtual / real-dynamic articulator method - occlusal approach areas and contact points in static occlusion: - qualitative - quantitative | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Agreement of occlusal approach areas and contact points in static occlusion in the digital, real-dynamic articulator method - Compared with the intraoral scanning method: - quantitative - qualitative - Compared with the intraoral situation: - quantitative - qualitative | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactSabine Linsen
UKB Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Outcome results
None listed