Skip to content

Bicenter RCT on clinical soft tissue response to a new implant-abutment connection with intermediate abutment compared to a tissue-level implant

Bicenter RCT on clinical soft tissue response to a new implant-abutment connection with intermediate abutment compared to a tissue-level implant

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00037477
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-07-17
Start date
2025-08-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at two centers investigating the soft tissue reactions in patients following implantation of a novel bone-level implant with a trioval-conical abutment connection and mesostructure. The study compares this with conventional tissue-level implants, focusing on clinical parameters of peri-implant soft tissue health and aesthetics.

Interventions

Group 1: In 40 patients requiring the insertion of at least two implants, two implants will be placed in each patient according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with adherence to the specified heal

Sponsors

Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Alterszahnmedizin und Funktionslehre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: No contraindications for implants. Above-average oral hygiene (API < 20%). Fully dentate / fixed prosthetic restoration with the need for 2 posterior tooth implants. Sufficient bone volume / history of augmentation to accommodate implants with at least 4 mm diameter and 9 mm length.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Contraindications for oral surgical procedures/implants. Active periodontal disease (PPD > 5 mm). Known pregnancy. Alcohol or drug abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bacterial load (reads) of the sulcular peri-implant soft tissue (taxonomic classification of bacteria)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. number of inflammatory cells, collagen and fibroblasts in the histological preparation of the peri-implant soft tissue 2. clinical survival rate of the implants used 3. clinical survival rate of the inserted crowns 4. marginal bone level 5. decrease of the peri-implant (Pink esthetic score) 6. patient assessment (PROMs: pain; chairside treatment time; comfort/homeliness) 7. bacterial diversity of the peri-implant sulcus 8. papilla index (Jemt) 9. white esthetic score (WES) 10. volume of the soft tissue by intraoral scan 11. plaque index (PPI) 12. bleeding on probing (BOP) 13 Modified Gingiva Index (MGI) 14. pocket depths (PPD) 15. attachment loss 16. width of keratinized mucosa (KM) 17. peri-implant tissue score (PITS) 18. matrix metalloproteinase 8 (sulcus fluid) 19. histological parameters (health status) 20. immunohistologic analyses (biopsy) 21. questionnaire (OHIP G14 + VAS) 22. prosthetic result (AEs including chipping)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactFlorian Beuer

Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Alterszahnmedizin und Funktionslehre

florian.beuer@charite.de+49 30 450 562 912

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026