I34.0
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Deactivated video goggles during transcatheter mitral valve repair
Group 2: Activated video goggles displaying a nature documentary during transcatheter mitral valve repair
Sponsors
Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing catheter-based mitral valve repair
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients without informed consent Patients aged = 18 years Pre-existing conditions: deafness, epilepsy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint of the study is the average dosage of propofol (in mg/kg/h) required for sedation during the procedure. Data collection occurs intraoperatively, from the initiation of sedation until the removal of the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe at the end of the mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair procedure. Propofol dosage is recorded in the standardized anesthesia protocol, capturing both bolus administrations and continuous infusion rates. The total administered dose is normalized to body weight and procedural time to calculate an average rate (mg/kg/h), enabling standardized comparison across patients. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Reduction of Anxiety, Stress, and Pain Time of Assessment: These parameters are assessed pre- and post-procedurally, on the day of the intervention, with follow-up immediately after the procedure once the patient is fully awake and responsive. Method of Measurement: Anxiety and Pain are measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no anxiety/pain) to 10 (worst imaginable anxiety/pain). Subjective stress reduction is inferred from changes in anxiety and pain levels and supplemented by patient-reported comfort levels (scale 0–3) immediately after the procedure. Additionally, overall satisfaction is assessed using the ZUF-8 questionnaire two days after the procedure, which reflects perceived care quality, comfort, and subjective well-being during hospitalization. Changes between pre- and post-procedural values are compared between the intervention and control group to assess the efficacy of audiovisual distraction. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactTobias Schmidt
Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
Outcome results
None listed