Skip to content

CARBOn Ion SBRT versus MicroWAVE Ablation as Locoregional Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

CARBOn Ion SBRT versus MicroWAVE Ablation as Locoregional Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma - CARBOWAVE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00037151
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-08-19
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

Interventions

Group 1: carbon ion stereotactic radiotherapy Group 2: microwave ablation

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Radiologische Klinik, RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Technical or functional irresectable primary or recurrent HCC • = 3 hepatic HCC-lesions, each of =3 cm diameter • Informed consent • ECOG 0-2 • CILD PUGH A-B7 (in case of liver cirrhosis) • BCLC 0-B • Age = 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Previous radiotherapy or local ablation of the HCC-lesion of interest • Planned liver transplantation at the time of inclusion • Patient is not able to consent • Microwave Ablation is technically not feasible (e.g. central localisation of the HCC lesion) • Carbon ion radiation is technically not feasible • Active medical implants for which there is no authorization for ion irradiation at the time of treatment (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, ...) • Simultaneous participation in another clinical study that could influence the outcome of this study or the other study • CHILD-PUGH > B7 (in case of liver cirrhosis) • BCLC > B • ECOG > 2 • Extrahepatic HCC disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Non-inferiority of the experimental group, carbon ion stereotactic radiotherapy, as compared to the control group, microwave ablation, with respect to the primary endpoint (local tumor control after 24 months) will be evaluated using a logistic regression model which adjusts for center, tumor size and number of lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Course of tumor marker (in case of AFP-elevation at start of treatment) • Toxicity (incl. liver function and changes in MELD score) • Overall survival (OS) • Progression-free survival (PFS) • Local Progression-free survival (LPFS) • Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT_Hep, EQ-5D) • Comfort of therapy (Patient-reported Outcome measurements) • Morphologic and functional changes in imaging after treatment • Analysis of radiation and ablation procedures as well as of the performed imaging

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactJakob Liermann

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Radiologische Klinik, RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie

jakob.liermann@med.uni-heidelberg.de+49 6221 56 8202

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026