Skip to content

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open liver surgery. Comparison of the postoperative outcomes of different surgical approaches according to the IWATE difficulty levels

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic versus open liver surgery. Comparison of the postoperative outcomes of different surgical approaches according to the IWATE difficulty levels

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00036636
Enrollment
814
Registered
2025-04-11
Start date
2024-06-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C22 D13.4 C78.7

Interventions

Group 1: Robotic-assisted liver resection Group 2: Laparoscopic liver resection Group 3: Open liver surgery

Sponsors

Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Elective liver surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Multivisceral resection Biliodigestive Anastomosis Emergency resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grad > III) within 90 days after resection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Operative data (Duration, Intraoperative Blood Loss, Duration of pringle etc.) -Postoperative data (Lenght of hospital stay, Revision Surgery, Intervention, In-house Mortality)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSchaima Abdelhadi

Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

schaima.abdelhadi@umm.de06213832225

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026