Skip to content

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Activity Pattern Scale (APS-GE) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Activity Pattern Scale (APS-GE) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00035996
Enrollment
600
Registered
2025-01-23
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M00-M99

Interventions

Group 1: In this validation study, N=579 patients with musculoskeletal pain of various diagnostic entities were recruited in order to psychometrically evaluate the German version of the Activity Patte

Sponsors

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (= 6 months), age between 18 and 80 years, sufficient cognitive resilience, ability to give consent, sufficient knowledge of German, sufficient literacy skills

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe psychiatric or neurological comorbidities (e.g. addiction, acute psychotic symptoms, severe depressive episode, dementia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The APS is translated into German according to guidelines for questionnaire translations (Beaton et al., 2000).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In addition to the pretesting of the German translation, the following psychometric properties are evaluated: Factor structure, construct validity (convergent validity), internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Prinsen et al., 2018; Beaton et al., 2000). In accordance with the recommendations of the COSMIN group (Prinsen et al., 2018), a sample size of 50 people per group is targeted for the reliability analysis. In addition, a comprehensive survey of criterion validity and a comparison of different diagnostic subgroups with regard to the distribution of the different activity patterns is carried out.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactFrank Petzke

Schmerzmedizin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

frank.petzke@med.uni-goettingen.de+495513967781

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026