Skip to content

Autonomy in medical rehabilitation

Autonomy in medical rehabilitation - AuRe

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00035893
Enrollment
945
Registered
2025-01-27
Start date
2025-01-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthopaedics, internal medicine/metabolic diseases, oncology, psychosomatics, cardiology, neurology

Interventions

Group 1: Rehabilitation patients with the six most common main indications (orthopaedics, internal medicine & metabolic diseases, oncology, psychosomatics, cardiology, neurology) are interviewed once

Sponsors

Institut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt (THWS)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Rehabilitants: -interview time after discharge from the rehabilitation clinic and a maximum of 4 weeks after the end of the rehabilitation stay Rehabilitation stay in one of co-operation clinics Rehabilitation programme in one of the above-mentioned main rehabilitation indications -Written consent to the study Professional group members: -Rehabilitation practitioners in the above-mentioned professional groups -employment in one of the above-mentioned co-operation clinics -working in at least one of the above-mentioned main rehabilitation indications -At least 1 year of professional experience in current position -Written consent to the study Rehabilitation institutions: -Written consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Insufficient knowledge of the German language Minority

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Research questions are: 1. what is the current status regarding the implementation of respect for rehabilitant autonomy in rehabilitation practice? Are there indication-specific differences? 2. How do the actors involved perceive the autonomy of rehabilitants? 3. To what extent are there difficulties in implementing the principle of autonomy? 4. can best practice approaches for preserving or promoting rehabilitant autonomy be identified?

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactTanja Henking

Institut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt (THWS)

tanja.henking@thws.de+49 9313511-8463

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026