Skip to content

Clinical, radiographic, economic, and patient-reported outcomes of short implants (=6mm) compared to regular implants (>6mm) with sinus floor elevation in the partially edentulous maxilla: A register-based cohort study (short vs long)

Clinical, radiographic, economic, and patient-reported outcomes of short implants (=6mm) compared to regular implants (>6mm) with sinus floor elevation in the partially edentulous maxilla: A register-based cohort study (short vs long)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00035504
Enrollment
180
Registered
2025-01-13
Start date
2025-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K08

Interventions

Group 1: Patients with short implants (length =6mm) [TEST] placed in the posterior maxilla (premolars and molars) without any bone augmentation procedure Group 2: Patients with regular implants (lengt

Sponsors

Universität Zürich, Klinik für Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - at least one implant in the posterior area - Implants with at least 1-year of follow-up at the time of the inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survival rate of short implants placed without bone augmentation in the posterior maxilla (molars and premolars) [TEST] and of regular implants combined with SFE [CONTROL], on a large scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Inflammation -Patient's satisfaction -Treatment costs

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Public ContactTim Joda

Universität Zürich, Klinik für Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin

tim.joda@zzm.uzh.ch+41 044634 04 04

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026