F20-F29 F19.2 F30-F39 F00 F20-F29 F40-F48 F45 F50 F60-F69 F80-F89 F99
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: The clinical sample group is recruited in the psychiatric clinic of the Charité Campus Mitte. Patients will be approached by the study team and supported by the PIA team. In addition, there a
Sponsors
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Clinical sample: patient in the psychiatric clinic at Charité Mitte Comparison sample: no psychiatric illnesses
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Age <18 years Insufficient knowledge of German to answer the questionnaires Lack of consent to participate in the study Lack of capacity to understand and consent to the study information
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Significant difference in BSRI and FGRS/MGRS-SF scores between psychiatric patients and a healthy comparison sample, measured by: Average values of BSRI (masculinity, femininity, androgyny) and FGRS/MGRS-SF for both groups. groups. Gender-differentiated analysis of gender role stress (FGRS/MGRS-SF): Comparison of FGRS/MGRS-SF values between men and women within the healthy and the clinical group. Relationship between androgyny and mental health: correlation of BSRI androgyny scores with mental health status (WHO-5, history of mental illness) for both groups. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Correlations between BSRI scores and FGRS/MGRS-SF: Correlation between BSRI masculinity and MGRS-SF; BSRI femininity and FGRS. Androgyny and low gender role stress: Correlation between androgyny score (BSRI) and gender role stress. Correlation between FGRS/MGRS-SF and well-being/functioning level: Correlation of FGRS/MGRS-SF with WHO-5 and MINI-ICF-APP-S scores. Mental flexibility and mental well-being: Comparison of PFQ scores with WHO-5 and MINI-ICF-APP-S in both groups. Psychological flexibility and resilience in androgyny: Analysis of PFQ and BRS scores in relation to BSRI scores. Use of coping strategies in relation to gender roles: Recording and comparison of BRIEF-COPE strategies by BSRI profile. Dysfunctional coping strategies and rigid gender roles: Analysing the use of dysfunctional coping strategies (BRIEF-COPE) in rigid BSRI profiles. Psychological flexibility, resilience and coping strategies in the clinical sample: Comparison of PFQ, BRS and BRIEF-COPE scores between healthy and clinical groups. Coping strategies and gender roles: Correlation of the subscales ‘Alcohol/Drugs’ with masculinity and ‘Emotional/Instrumental Support’ with femininity. ACE-D and mental health and flexibility: Correlation between ACE-D and WHO-5, PFQ and BRIEF-COPE. ACE-D and gender role self-concept: Correlation between ACE-D and BSRI scores. Differences in gender roles and stress by socioeconomic status: Analysing DiMIS scores and their influence on BSRI and FGRS/MGRS-SF. Influence of educational status, sexual orientation and GDR background: Comparison of BSRI scores for groups with different demographic characteristics. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactEva Friedel
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Outcome results
None listed