Skip to content

Frailty in primary care: Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic significance for hospitalization, falls, mortality, institutionalization, and frequency of physician visits

Frailty in primary care: Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic significance for hospitalization, falls, mortality, institutionalization, and frequency of physician visits

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00035276
Enrollment
350
Registered
2024-10-16
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty

Interventions

Group 1: Patient/subject characteristics For the study investigating frailty in primary care, patients who can give a written, revocable consent to participate in the study themselves or through their

Sponsors

Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients registered in the participating general practitioner's office - Aged 65 years and older - Patients who are able to understand instructions and comply with the questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Individuals with severe cognitive impairments who are not capable of understanding instructions (e.g. severe dementia or advanced neurological conditions). - Patients in a palliative state or with a life expectancy of less than one year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the prevalence of frailty in primary care and the prognostic significance of the frailty syndrome for the following clinical endpoints: - Hospitalizations - Physician visits - Institutionalization - Falls - Mortality - Increase in care dependency - Frailty progression over a period of one year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Identification of determinants for frailty in the primary care patient population. - Identification of the leading compensated and uncompensated problem areas in frail (compared to non-frail) elderly patients. - Evaluation of the SEISAR tool as a diagnostic (frailty) and prognostic instrument in primary care. - Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of SEISAR and MPI-CGA. - Assessment of the suitability of SEISAR for use in primary care.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMaximilian König

Universitätsmedizin Greifswald

maximilian.koenig@med.uni-greifswald.de+49 (0)3834 86 4890

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026