No specific condition will be evaluated. There is no patient involvement as a fictitious scenario is used and the study is focussed on health care professionals (pharmacists).
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Participating pharmacists and future pharmacists within their pharmaceutical internship answer an online questionnaire to record personal details (e.g. professional experience, qualifications
Sponsors
Universität Bonn
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Licence to practice as a pharmacist or future pharmacists within the pharmaceutical internship (third part of qualification) - Further training in accordance with the “BAK curriculum on Medication reviews, medication management as a process" by the Federal Chamber of Pharmacists (BAK) or at least equivalent further or advanced training - Affiliation to the Chamber of Pharmacists in North Rhine or Westphalia-Lippe
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1.1 Measurability of the quality of processes and outcomes of medication reviews by the proficiency test system with virtual patients 1.2 Differentiation of the quality of processes and outcomes of medication reviews by the proficiency test system 1.3 Correlation of the quality of the performed medication reviews with the measurement of the quality indicators (validation of the quality indicators for medication reviews) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 2.1 Performance of medication reviews regarding processes fidelity and medication review outcomes 2.2 Identification of (further) factors influencing the quality of processes and outcomes of medication reviews 2.3 User acceptance by participants 2.4 Status quo of the communication of medication review outcomes within a report to the prescriber | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactCarolin Keip
Universität Bonn
Outcome results
None listed