Skip to content

Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Optimize Expectations of Psychosomatic Rehabilitation in Patients with Post-COVID-Syndrome

Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Optimize Expectations of Psychosomatic Rehabilitation in Patients with Post-COVID-Syndrome - PoCo-FRAME

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00034671
Enrollment
84
Registered
2025-05-22
Start date
2025-06-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

U09.9

Interventions

Group 1: control group (receives standard treatment
TAU) Group 2: intervention group JOURNAL: in addition to standard treatment (TAU), realistic-optimistic expectations should be formulated and written down in a journal Group 3: intervention group FRAM
an imagination exercise is used

Sponsors

Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Post-COVID in one of the participating psychosomatic rehabilitation clinics, written declaration of consent to participate in the study, sufficient knowledge of German.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - no Post-COVID syndrome - Written informed consent for study participation not given - insufficient knowledge of German - current psychotic symptoms - substance dependence and abuse - organic brain diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The study is a longitudinal survey in which patients are interviewed and examined at three points in time: At the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of the rehabilitation program and after 6 months (T2). The outcome variables are collected using standardized questionnaires and examinations based on current studies. The main target variables are the therapeutic outcomes, which are operationalized by clinical assessment, questionnaires and tests. As the predominant symptoms in post-Covid patients can vary, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO DAS 2.0) as a measure of general condition and functioning and the Work Ability Index (WAI) as a proxy for earning capacity are considered the most important outcomes. In addition, sick days and work volume (full/part-time) are recorded after 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary target criteria are symptom-related questionnaires and objective measures to record the improvement in symptoms and mediating factors (mediators). These are operationalized by questionnaire scores or objective data such as the distance walked within 6 min (6-min walk test), blood pressure, pulse parameters and cognitive performance (memory span, reaction time, inhibition ability). Questionnaires: - Regensburg COVID documentation (ReCoRD; recording of 25 COVID-19 and post-Covid symptoms; 25 items) - General state of health, level of functioning and participation (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0; short form 12 items) - Somatoform complaints and B-symptoms (Patient's Health Questionnaire, PHQ-15; Somatic Symptom Disorder, SSD-12; 27 items in total) - Depressiveness (PHQ-9, 9 items) - Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder, GAD-7, 7 items) - Fatigue (Fatigue Scale for Motor Function and Cognition, FSMC, 20 items) - Work Ability Index (WAI; 7 items) - Post-exertional malaise (DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, 10 items) - Self-efficacy expectations (SWE, 10 items) - Expectations of rehab and the rehab outcome (TEX-Q, 19 items) - Quality of life and general state of health (2 items) - Transdiagnostic personality structure (OPD-SFK, 12 items) - Perfectionism (FMPS-D; 35 items) Objective measures: - Tests on the PC and on paper to assess cognitive performance such as attention span, memory performance and reaction times (Corsi Span Test, Color Stroop Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Inspired Task, d2 test) (approx. 15-20 min in total) - 6-min walking test (approx. 10 min in total) - Blood pressure (3 min) - 5-min pulse measurement at rest (heart rate variability) (approx. 7 min) Objective measures: - Clinical assessment of the rehabilitation outcome and the ability to work and earn by the practitioner (evaluation of the final report).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactKatja Weimer

Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie Universitätsklinikum Ulm

katja.weimer@uni-ulm.de+49 731 500 61953

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026