Experimental analyses and evidence-based recommendations for a health-promoting and productively designed work from home in the context of digital transformation

Experimental analyses and evidence-based recommendations for a health-promoting and productively designed work from home in the context of digital transformation - ProHome

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00034447

Enrollment

350

Registered

2024-08-06

Start date

2025-01-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health-related quality of life, work-related stress, job satisfaction and productivity

Interventions

Group 1: Intervention group The intervention includes scientific findings on topics such as remote leadership, promoting social interaction and communication in the organisation, creating an ergonom

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 6 months work experience

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: less than 6 months work experience

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary objective criterion is to evaluate the effectiveness of needs-based interventions carried out between T0 and T1 (online questionnaires) for the intervention group and between T1 and T2 (online questionnaires) for the waiting control group on the health, job satisfaction and productivity of the participants. Health-related quality of life is measured using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8, 8 items). Job satisfaction is measured using Scarpello & Campbell, 1983 (1 item). Productivity is measured using the scale by Bélanger, 1999 (6 items).	—

Measure

Time frame

The primary objective criterion is to evaluate the effectiveness of needs-based interventions carried out between T0 and T1 (online questionnaires) for the intervention group and between T1 and T2 (online questionnaires) for the waiting control group on the health, job satisfaction and productivity of the participants. Health-related quality of life is measured using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8, 8 items). Job satisfaction is measured using Scarpello & Campbell, 1983 (1 item). Productivity is measured using the scale by Bélanger, 1999 (6 items).

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Several secondary endpoints are recorded: Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC-4, 4 items) Irritation scale (8 items) Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GDA-2, 2 items) Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ, 7 items) Digital Stressors Scale (DSS) (dimensions: overload 5 items, support 5 items) Smoking behaviour (DEBRA, 1 item) Audit-C (alcohol consumption, 3 items) Nutrition, GDEA European Health Interview Survey, wave 3, 2019 (1 item) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ, 20 items) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Homeoffice (COPSOQ 10 items)	—

Measure

Time frame

Several secondary endpoints are recorded: Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC-4, 4 items) Irritation scale (8 items) Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GDA-2, 2 items) Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ, 7 items) Digital Stressors Scale (DSS) (dimensions: overload 5 items, support 5 items) Smoking behaviour (DEBRA, 1 item) Audit-C (alcohol consumption, 3 items) Nutrition, GDEA European Health Interview Survey, wave 3, 2019 (1 item) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ, 20 items) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Homeoffice (COPSOQ 10 items)

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactHellen Giessen

Lehrstuhl für BWL, insb. Arbeit, Personal und Organisation

Hellen.giessen@hhu.de+49 211 81-13493

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026