M00-M99
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Intervention in the form of an interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in an outpatient clinic. The treatment includes active treatment elements such as exercise therapy, relaxation techniq
Sponsors
MSB Medical School Berlin
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: People with chronic pain in the musculoskeletal system who require interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy and have a hypermobility syndrome, previous outpatient treatment methods that have not been successful or have only been successful in the short term, written consent to participate in the study, sufficient knowledge of German and ability to understand and process the questionnaires and instruction material.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Participation in other studies, lack of group compatibility, inadequate physical capacity for the physical exercise program content, physical or mental illnesses that hinder therapy (e.g. significant internal illnesses or psychotic symptoms), clear conflict of interest between requesting a pension and alleviating symptoms, serious organic cause of pain (e.g. tumor, fracture, inflammation), pregnancy.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary dependent variable is pain intensity. Recorded in the self-report as a diary item at all points of measurement (day 1 - day 56). ("How would you rate your pain today? 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst pain imaginable"). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pain severity (von Korff, von Korff et al., 1992) at T0, T1, T2. Health-related quality of life (VR12, Buchholz, Feng, Buchholz, Kazis, & Kohlmann, 2021) at T0, T1, T2. Wellbeing (FW-7, Basler, H. D. 1999) at T0, T1, T2. Mental health (DASS, Nilges & Essau, 2021) at T0, T1, T2. Confidence in treatment (10-point scale (questions to measure confidence; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00278-017-0184-x ) at T0. Catastrophizing (PCS, Meyer, Sprott, & Mannion, 2008) at T0, T1, T2. Pain avoidance and endurance strategies (AE-FS, Wolff, Willburger, Hallner, Rusu, Rusche, Schulte, & Hasenbring, 2018) at T0. Self-efficacy (FESS, Mangels, Schwarz, Sohr, Holme, & Rief, 2009) at T0, T1, T2. Self-control (SCS-KD, Bertrams & Dickhäuser, 2009) at T0. Coordination and stability (obj. assessed by S3-Check, Raschner, Lembert, Platzer, Patterson, Hilden, & Lutz, 2008) at T1, T2. Coordination and stability (obj. recorded by S3-Check, Raschner, Lembert, Platzer, Patterson, Hilden, & Lutz, 2008) at T1, T2. Strength and endurance (obj. assessed by plank test, Tan, Aziz, Teh, & Chia, 2004) at T1, T2. Variables collected daily (day 1-day 56) as diary items: Social support (I am satisfied with the support I received today from people close to me. I am satisfied with the support I received from medical staff today. (0 "very dissatisfied" to 5 "very satisfied"). Self-efficacy - physical activity (I am sure that I will manage to be physically active today, even if I am in pain (0 "not at all" to 3 "exactly right")). Self-efficacy - pain-related in general (I can cope with my pain in most situations today (0 "not at all true" to 3 "exactly true")). Negative affect (How do you feel at the moment? (angry, frightened, nervous, anxious) Fear of movement (I am afraid that I might injure myself if I am physically active) Relaxation ("I feel very relaxed" 5-level response format) Physical activity ("Were you physically active in your free time today?" "How long did the | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactLena Fleig
MSB Medical School Berlin
Outcome results
None listed