Skip to content

Clinical, microbiological and histological comparison of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) sutures following third molar extraction - A split-mouth prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Clinical, microbiological and histological comparison of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) sutures following third molar extraction - A split-mouth prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial - PTFE vs. Vicryl Sutures: Clinical Outcomes in Third Molar Extractions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00034216
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-08-05
Start date
2024-08-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K01.0 K01.1

Interventions

Group 1: The treatment with the respective suture material is randomly assigned (1:1) to one of the two sides (left, right): - Treatment A/1- (ePTFE) Group 2: - Treatment B/2 - (Vicryl)

Sponsors

Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients who require an osteotomy of at least two wisdom teeth with at least 1 tooth per side - Patient age =18 years - Patients with a written declaration of consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients <18 years of age - Patients with absolute contraindication for surgical interventions - Patients with allergies to medical products/medications - Patients with chronic medication that could affect pain sensation and/or the inflammatory response and/or wound healing - Immunocompromised patients - Existing oral diseases or symptoms that could influence an assessment of the target variables or the efficacy of the preparations, such as existing intraoral infections - Patients without written informed consent - Pregnancy and breastfeeding mothers are also excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Wound healing of the oral soft tissue - Comparison of the intraoral wound healing process on both sides using the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) on the 1st, 2nd and 10th postoperative day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Incidence of complications after 30 days - Qualitative analysis of bacterial colonisation Qualitative comparison of bacterial colonisation for each suture material on the 10th postoperative day after suture removal. - Visual analysis of bacterial colonisation on the 10th postoperative day after suture removal - Histological analysis of the inflammatory reaction on the 10th postoperative day after suture removal - Clinical assessment of suture handling by the surgeon immediately postoperatively and by the examiner on the 10th postoperative day after suture removal - Safety of the suture material by evaluating the "suture slack" at the end of the operation - Evaluation of patient satisfaction (PROMs) on the 10th postoperative day

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAnne-Kathrin Bär

Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz

baer.anne@icloud.com0261-281-27890

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026