Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Conventional Compared to Segmented Esophageal Fully Covered Self-expanding Metal Stents: a Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study

Safety and Efficacy of Conventional Compared to Segmented Esophageal Fully Covered Self-expanding Metal Stents: a Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00034173
Enrollment
160
Registered
2024-05-17
Start date
2023-11-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K22.2 C15.9

Interventions

Group 1: Patients that received conventional-esophageal fully covered self-expanding metal stents for the treatment of esophageal strictures Group 2: Patients that received segmented 2esophageal fully

Sponsors

Asklepios Krankenhaus Barmbek
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Benign esophageal stenosis Malign esophageal stenosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Esophageal stenting for other reasons than stenosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical Success (migration and stent occlusion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
severe clinical complications

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThomas von Hahn

Asklepios Krankenhaus Barmbek

T.hahn@asklepios.com+491818820

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026