Mental health disorders according to DSM-5, as measured by the Short Interview for Mental Disorders (Mini-DIPS
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • At least one diagnosis of a mental health disorder according to the DSM-5, as assessed by means of Mini-DIPS (Magraf & Cwik, 2017; for exceptions see exclusion criteria), the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-5-CV, only the subset of questions dealing with ADHS, Beesdo-Baum, K., Zaudig, M., & Wittchen, H.-U., 2019), and the Structured Clinical Interview for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD, Beesdo-Baum, K., Zaudig, M., & Wittchen, H.-U., 2019) • At least 1 cut-off of the following measures is exceeded: 1) Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ = 9.88), 2) State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (S-DERS = 46.97), or 3) “Interpersonal Relationships” subscale of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (EB-45 = 13) • Traumatic experiences in childhood and/or adolescence: moderate to severe scores on one of the subscales of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ; Klinitzke et al., 2012) according to Häuser and colleagues (2011) • Fluent in German • Health insurance
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Posttraumatic stress disorder, as assessed with Mini-DIPS (Margraf & Cwik, 2017) - moderate or severe substance abuse disorder (exception: cannabis), as assessed with Mini-DIPS (Margraf & Cwik, 2017) - currently suffering from acute psychotic symptoms, as assessed with Mini-DIPS (Margraf & Cwik, 2017) - currently suffering from acute manic symptoms, as assessed with Mini-DIPS (Margraf & Cwik, 2017) - Autism spectrum disorder, as assessed with the short version of the Autism spectrum quotient questionnaire (AQ-10; Allison et al., 2012) - currently participating in another psychotherapy - severe cognitive impairment (IQ 6 dioptres and no contact lenses
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Acceptance of the intervention: -Patient satisfaction: Fragebogen zur Patientenzufriedenheit (ZUF-8; Schmidt et al., 1989; end of therapy, T2) -Therapist satisfaction: Acceptability of Intervention Measure and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (AIM; Weiner et al., 2017; end of therapy, T2) -Potential negative effects: through study patients with Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ; Rozental et al., 2019) reported (end of therapy, T2) -Adherence: Study dropout and number of therapy sessions used -Reasons for therapy dropout: Reasons for Terminating Therapy Scale (RTTS; Roe et al., 2006) Feasibility: - Speed of recruitment and recruitment rate - Completeness of assessments - Study dropout - Quality of module-specific cut-off values Assessment of intervention effects and working mechanisms of MeMoPsy: -Self-report for symptom severity: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Franke, 2000; end of therapy, T2) -Clinically rated symptom severity: Therapists assess Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) and Global Assessment of Relational Functioning (GARF) every 5th session; the diagnostics team (blind) assesses GAF at T0 and T2 | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Differences with regard to working mechanisms of MeMoPsy and CBT will be assessed using the following self-report questionnaires: Expected psychobiological mechanisms of change: - Rejection sensitivity: Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ; Downey & Feldman, 1996; T1, T2 und T3) - Emotion dysregulation: State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (S-DERS; Lavender et al., 2017; T1, T2 und T3) - Social relationships: Ergebnisfragebogen-45, subscale „Zwischenmenschliche Beziehungen“ (EB-45; Haug et al., 2004; T1, T2 und T3) Changes in symptom severity and working alliance at T1, T2 and T3 - Severity of personality disorder: German, modified short version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5-BF+M, Bach et al., 2020) and the German version of Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF, Spitzer et al. 2021) - Severity of borderline personality disorder: Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühlen (FGG; Renneberg et al., 2010) and 23-item version of the Borderline Symptom Liste (BSL-23; Bohus et al., 2009) - Social support: ENRICHD Social Support Inventory (ESSI; Cordes et al., 2009) - Mentalizing capacity: Certainty about Mental State Questionnaire (CAMSQ; Müller et al., 2021) - Dissociation: 4-Item-Version of the Dissoziations-Spannungs-Skala (Stiglmayr et al., 2009). - Overall clinical impression (Schweregrad, Verbesserung): Clinical Global Impression (Guy, 1976; T1 und T2) - DZPG Minimum Data Set which contains general questions about physical and mental health during the course of the therapy - Medication - Psychotherapeutic processes: Therapeutic homework and therapeutic interventions (self-designed Therapeutic Elements Checklist) - Working alliance: Working Alliance Inventory – Short Revised (WAI-SR; Munder et al., 2010); patient and therapist at T1 and T2 Therapeutic processes in the MeMoPsy group: - Content of therapy session: Stundenbogen für die allgemeine und differentielle Einzelpsychotherapie (STEP; Kra | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie