N00-N99 R32 E29.1 I86.1 C00-D48
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Study procedure
The study comprises four phases: (1) enrolment, (2) generation and preparation of responses, (3) evaluation, and (4) data analysis. Patients are enrolled during routine outpat
n = 40
based on the sample size calculation), relevant contextual information, and the treating urologists’ verbal answers are captured via audio recording, subsequently transcribed, and anonymised prior to
to ensure blinding, only explicit source cues and non-content elements are removed for both sources (without paraphrasing or altering informational content). The resulting response pairs are randomise
Sponsors
Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • Diverse patients with medical conditions in urology that require a consultation by a board certified urologist • sufficient German language skills • Consent to participate
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Without consent to participate • insufficient German language skills
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint of the study is the criterion medical accuracy. This score was selected due to its relevance to clinical practice, its low variability, and its high relevance to patient care. This endpoint will be operationalised as a composite score based on the first three medical accuracy items (items 1–3) rated on a 0–10 Likert scale. The primary endpoint will be assessed exclusively by expert raters. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| All outcomes other than the primary medical accuracy composite (items 1–3) will be analysed as secondary or exploratory. These will include all additional expert-rated scales and items beyond the primary endpoint, as well as all outcomes assessed in the lay-rater group. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactArkadiusz Miernik
Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Outcome results
None listed