Skip to content

Effects of mirror therapy on the excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals and stroke patients.

Effects of mirror therapy on the excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals and stroke patients.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00033890
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-03-21
Start date
2024-03-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I60 I61 I63 I64

Interventions

Group 1: TMS examination during condition 1: Viewing the mirror image of the right hand (healthy person) or the unaffected hand (patient) while this hand performs a forceps grip with 10% of the maxim

Sponsors

Lurija Institut Kliniken Schmieder Allensbach
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: I. Healthy subjects: 1. Ability to give informed consent to participate in the study 2. Age > 18 years 3. No history of neurological or psychiatric illness 4. Not taking any medication known to affect the excitability of the brain (e.g. benzodiazepines) II. Patients 1. Ability to give consent to participate in the study 2. Age > 18 years 3. Sufficient understanding of the task 4. No or minor pain in the affected arm, measured by visual analog scale 5. First stroke (ischemia or hemorrhage), not longer than 6 months ago 6. Rehabilitation phase C or D 7. Paresis of the upper limb with a strength level of 3 to 4+ or impairment of fine motor skills

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: I. Healthy subjects: 1. Participants with electronic implants (e.g. pacemakers) 2. Epilepsy 3. Pregnancy 4. Intracranial metal particles (e.g. vascular clips) II. Patients 1. Cognitive impairments that do not allow information about the study (e.g. Wernicke's aphasia, global aphasia, dementia) 2. Participants with poor compliance 3. Pain 4. Participants with electronic implants (e.g. pacemakers) 5. Epilepsy 6. Pregnancy 7. Intracranial metal particles (e.g. vascular clips)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
TMS parameters (derivation from the interosseus dorsalis I muscle; stimulation with the butterfly coil): Single stimulus amplitudes, short- and long-latency intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Mental chronometry with the box and block test (comparison of motor execution and motor imagery). 2. Vividness of movement imagery questionnaire (German version). 3. Examination of somatosensory functions (vibration sensation, proprioceptive test), as severely impaired sensitivity has a negative impact on the ability to perform mental chronometry and could therefore also have an influence on mirror perception. 4 Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactJana Stürner

Lurija Institut, Kliniken Schmieder Allensbach

j.stuerner@kliniken-schmieder.de+49 7533 808 1404

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026