F00-F99
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Revised work-related medical rehabilitation after implementation of the newly aligned practice recommendations (Who provides? Interprofessional rehabilitation team
How? Face-to-face, individual sessions and group sessions
Where? Inpatient rehabilitation centers
When and how much? Five weeks)
Group 2: Work-related medical rehabilitation as is before implementation of the newly aligned practice recommendations (Who provides? Interprofessional rehabilitation te
When and how much? Five weeks)
Sponsors
Universität zu Lübeck, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: We include patients aged 18 to 65 years who are treated in a work-related medical rehabilitation program. Our participants complete their rehabilitation before the implementation of the newly consented practice recommendations (work-related medical rehabilitation as is) or after the implementation of the newly consented practice recommendations (work-related medical rehabilitation revised).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Achievement of work-related rehabilitation goals; How? Continuously, 0 to 32 points (Markus et al. 2021); When? End of rehabilitation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Work-related contents; How? Continuously, 0 to 12 points (Markus et al. 2021); When? End of rehabilitation Consistency of the work-related rehabilitation strategy; How? Continuously, 0 to 24 points (Markus et al. 2021); When? End of rehabilitation Therapies; How? Continuously, minutes or hours, medical discharge report (Deutsche Rentenversicherung, 2014); When? End of rehabilitation Patient satisfaction; How? Continuously, 8 to 32 points, ZUF-8 (Attkisson und Zwick 1982); When? End of rehabilitation Employment; How? Binary, yes/no, own development; When? Begin of rehabilitation Sickness absence before rehabilitation; How? Binary, yes/no, own development; When? Begin of rehabilitation Accumulated sickness absence before the start of rehabilitation; How? Continuously, 0 to 52 weeks, own development; When? Begin of rehabilitation Self-rated work ability; How? Continuously, 0 to 10 points, Work Ability Score (Ilmarinen 2007); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Job anxiety; How? Continuously, 0 to 8 points, Modified Job Anxiety Scale (Muschalla et al. 2016); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Physical functioning, How? Continuously, 0 to 100 points, SF-36 (Morfeld et al. 2011); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Pain, How? Continuously, 0 to 10 points, IRES-24 (Wirtz et al. 2005); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Somatoform disorders, How? Continuously, 0 to 28 points, HEALTH-49 (Rabung et al. 2009); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Depression, How? Continuously, 0 to 24 points, HEALTH-49 (Rabung et al. 2009); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Phobic fears, How? Continuously, 0 to 20 points, HEALTH-49 (Rabung et al. 2009); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Self-efficacy, How? Continuously, 0 to 20 points, HEALTH-49 (Rabung et al. 2009); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Interactional difficulties, How? Continuously, 0 to 28 points, HEALTH-49 (Rabung et al. 2009); When? Begin and end of rehabilitation Work capacity for former | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactMatthias Bethge
Universität zu Lübeck, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie
Outcome results
None listed