Skip to content

The differences between fatiguing concentric and eccentric exercise on motor control

The differences between fatiguing concentric and eccentric exercise on motor control

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00033684
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-02-23
Start date
2024-01-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of sports injuries

Interventions

Group 1: Concentric fatiguing exercise: 5 sets of 15 maximal concentric knee extensions each on isokinetics at 45°/s from 95 - 5° with 30 s rest between each set. Motor control tests: Before and after

Sponsors

Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Sports students

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Injuries in the lower extremity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The differences between concentric and eccentric fatigue in single leg jump performance

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Fatigue: - maximum eccentric and concentric maximum force (pre vs post) - maximum single-leg jump height (pre vs post) The differences between concentric and eccentric fatigue in different motor control tasks (single leg jumps and power control): - Ground reaction force (peak force, time to stabilisation, etc.) - neuromuscular activation (vastus lateralis muscle, vastus medialis muscle, rectus femoris muscle, gastrocnemius lateralis muscle) - Joint angle (knee joint flexion, plantar flexion, hip flexion, etc.) - Deviation from the specified torque and joint angle position (force control tests)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristian Baumgart

Bergische Universität Wuppertal

baumgart@uni-wuppertal.de+492024393758

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026