Skip to content

Is ergometer training safe and feasible for inpatient myocardial infraction (MI) persons as part of the mobilization plan in physiotherapy treatment?

Is ergometer training safe and feasible for inpatient myocardial infraction (MI) persons as part of the mobilization plan in physiotherapy treatment?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00033634
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-04-22
Start date
2024-06-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I21

Interventions

Group 1: All patients receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medications as usual. Physiotherapy includes heart attack mobilization after PCI and ergometer training from stage II (3rd da

Sponsors

Klinikum am Steinenberg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI and STEMI) with PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Myocardial infarction with conservative therapy Palliative, dementia or immobile patients

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cardiovascular endurance (time, meters, resistance during Motomed training)

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients with complaints/stopping training

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactKinga Balla

Klinikum am Steinenberg

kinga.balla@kliniken-rt.de+4971212001459

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026