Skip to content

Supporting decisions to disburden the clinical emergency care of acute patients in context of emergency medical services operations – RTWAkut Study

Supporting decisions to disburden the clinical emergency care of acute patients in context of emergency medical services operations – RTWAkut Study - RTWAkut

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00033595
Enrollment
17520
Registered
2024-10-18
Start date
2025-04-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Study does not focus on specific diagnoses

Interventions

Group 1: EMS patients with acute care needs will be assessed using SmED and redirected to ambulatory care via IVENA eHealth or eTS.

Sponsors

Bayerisches Staatsministerium des Innern, für Sport und Integration
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All persons for whom the responsible paramedic on site excluded an emergency in accordance with the State Rescue Service Act and declared the EMS operation to be terminated.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Underage patients - Emergencies - Pregnant woman - Limited or absent ability to give informed consent - Lack of competency in german language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
- Proportion of patients, who are referred to ambulatory care

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Health care processes of referred patients • Proportion of people, who are transported to a emergency department after SmED assessment • Proportion of patients, who are admitted from cooperation practices (CP) or on-call practice to an ED • Proportion of patients, who are referred from CP to another specialty • Reasons for admission from a CP to a ED or referral from a CP to another specialty - Demographic and medical characteristics of referred patients • Age groups • Gender • Symptoms • Main and additional complaints - Reasons for ED utilisation and satisfaction with the redirection offering from the patients' perspective - Feasibility and acceptance of redirection offering from EMS staff perspective - Course of time • Duration after the EMS operation until the CP or on-call practice appointment • Total duration of EMS operations with SmED utilitation • Time intervals in emergency care (prehospital time interval, on-scene interval, handover interval and instauration of standby duty) for EMS operations with SmED utilitation • Duration after the arrival of the evaluating EMS until the start of SmED - Proportion of emergency medical physician involvement in operations with SmED utilitation - Proportion of different keyword combinations in operations with SmED utilitation - Patient safety • Proportion of patients for whom a new EMS operation is triggered within 72 hours after SmED assessment and redirection to ambulatory care • Proportion of patients for whom a new EMS operation is triggered within 72 hours after SmED assessment and refusal of the redirection offer • Specialist assessment of the reasons for a new EMS operation and the medical deployment documentation with regard to the potential risk by the initial decision

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristian Pfeiffer

Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns

manuel.holder@kvb.de+49 8213256310

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026