Clinical and radiographic results of the combined dorsoventral in comparison to the dorsal only osteosynthetic stabilization of pelvic ring fractures in polytraumatized patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00033420

Enrollment

150

Registered

2024-02-19

Start date

2024-05-03

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

S32

Interventions

Group 1: Patients with operatively treated pelvic ring fractures undergoing combined dorsoventral stabilization. Retrospective analysis containing trauma mechanism, injury severity score, concomitant

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -surgically treated pelvic ring fracture (AO/OTA 61B or 61C) resulting from polytrauma (polytrauma defined after the new Berlin-classification: ISS >15, AIS >2 in at least two different regions; at least one of the following: Hypotension <90 mmHg, loss of consciousness GCS = 8, acidosis with BE = 6,0, coag-ulopathy with PTT = 40 seconds or INR = 1,4. age = 70)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -concomitant fracture of the acetabulum -exitus letalis prior to surgery -missing consent in data processing or objecting again taking part in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Influence of the type of osteosynthetic stabilization (combined dorsoventral vs. dorsal only) on short- and long term survival in polytraumatized patients 2. functional outcome after combined dorsoventral or dorsal only osteosynthetic stabilization 3. Influence of the type of osteosynthetic stabilization on long term quality of life in polytraumatized patients	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Influence of the type of osteosynthetic stabilization (combined dorsoventral vs. dorsal only) on the quality of fracture reduction 2. Influence of the type of osteosynthetic stabilization (combined dorsoventral vs. dorsal only) on length of stay, patients re-mobilization, number of needed packed red blood cells, post stationary disposition of the patient, pain at the time of discharge 3. Comparison of the social reintegration in both types of osteosythesis 4. Rate of complications in each type of osteosynthesis	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Influence of the type of osteosynthetic stabilization (combined dorsoventral vs. dorsal only) on the quality of fracture reduction 2. Influence of the type of osteosynthetic stabilization (combined dorsoventral vs. dorsal only) on length of stay, patients re-mobilization, number of needed packed red blood cells, post stationary disposition of the patient, pain at the time of discharge 3. Comparison of the social reintegration in both types of osteosythesis 4. Rate of complications in each type of osteosynthesis

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactTim Westenhöfer

Uniklinik RWTH Aachen

tim.westenhoefer@rwth-aachen.de+49176 41823852

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026