Skip to content

2-stage versus 3-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis - a retrospective analysis

2-stage versus 3-stage restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis - a retrospective analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00033015
Enrollment
176
Registered
2023-11-10
Start date
2022-08-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K51

Interventions

Group 1: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in a two-stage procedure between 2001 and 2022. Group 2:

Sponsors

Chirurgische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Histologically proven ulcerative colitis (UC) - Performance of IPAA as a 2-stage or 3-stage procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary endpoint was the incidence of pouch failure during long-term follow-up (median 8 years).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints were the incidence of in-hospital morbidity, longer hospital stay and 90-days-readmission as well as fail of improved quality of life during long-term follow-up (median 8 years).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMaximilian Brunner

Chirurgische Klinik des Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

Maximilian.Brunner@uk-erlangen.de09131/853296

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026