Skip to content

Clinical effects of treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF): a double-blind randomized controlled pilot study

Clinical effects of treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF): a double-blind randomized controlled pilot study - PEMF in CRPS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00033005
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-11-09
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

G90.5 G90.6 G90.7

Interventions

Group 1: PEMF Treatment Group 2: Placebo treatment (device application without effect)

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: CRPS of the upper and/or lower extremity reliably diagnosed according to Budapest criteria (differential diagnoses are excluded)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Change in therapy in the last 3 weeks before inclusion in the study or cortisone therapy within the last four weeks before inclusion - Patients who are not capable of giving informed consent themselves - Patients who are physically or mentally incapable of using the device independently - Patients with cognitive deficits or limited knowledge of the German language, which may lead to difficulties in data collection - Patients with pacemakers, defibrillators or other active implants - Patients with magnetic implants (non-MRI compatible implants) - Patients receiving corticosteroid injections - Patients with severe infections, polyneuropathy or other neurological diseases that can affect sensory or motor function and that cannot be differentiated from CRPS by the patient - Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding - Patients with tumor diseases - Patients with a tendency to bleed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CRPS severity score (CSS) relative to baseline comparing verum and sham stimulation after 84 days of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Pain intensity compared verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days measured with NRS 0-10 - Motor impairment compared verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days, measured with the QuickDash for the upper extremity and Walking Steps for the lower extremity - Emotional well-being compared verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days, measured with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) - Sleep compared to verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days, measured with the PROMIS-SD (PROMIS Sleep Disturbance) - Impairment due to pain compared to verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days, measured with the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) - Quality of life compared to verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days, measured with EQ4 and module L, health-related quality of life, of the German Pain Questionnaire - Somatosensory profile in quantitative sensory testing in comparison verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 84 days - Reduction in pain and impairment due to CRPS compared to verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline, measured with the PGIC (Patients Global Impression of Change). Comparison of verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline after 28 days and 84 days of treatment with Oska Pulse: Reduction in pain and impairment due to CRPS compared verum/sham stimulation relative to baseline, as measured by the PGIC (Patients Global Impression of Change).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactJanne Gierthmühlen

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel

ambulanz.schmerztherapie.kiel@uksh.de+4943150020910

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 27, 2026