F91 F90.1 F92
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: N = 80 boys participate in an introductory VR session and the VR test
Sponsors
Ausbildungsinstitut für Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychotherapie der Uniklinik Köln (AKiP)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
Male
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Clinical sample: Hyperkinetic Conduct Disorder (F90.1) or Diagnosis of Conduct Disorder (F91) or Combined Disorder of Conduct and Emotions (F92) at therapy start Non-clinical sample: No evidence for the presence of a conduct disorder in parent ratings (FBB-SSV < 7, Döpfner & Görtz-Dorten, 2017) and clinical significant peer-related aggression (FAVK-E < 7, Görtz-Dorten & Döpfner, 2011)
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Main diagnosis of a pervasive developmental disorder (F84) or other mental disorders - IQ below 80 (assessed using common methods [e.g. Culture Fair Test], clinical impression, information from anamnesis interview) - Evidence of past or present epilepsy - Occurrence of cybersickness during the VR introduction session
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Evidence for reliable and valid scales of the VR-test; confirmed by correlations with scales of the Questionnaire for Aggressive Behavior in Children (FAVK-E/FAVK-S; Görtz-Dorten & Döpfner, 2011) and the Symptom Checklist for Disruptive Behavior Disorders - Self-rating/Proxy rating (SBB/FBB-SSV; Döpfner & Görtz-Dorten, 2017). Additionally in the clinical sample: Correlations with the Clinical Parent Interview for Externalizing Disorders in Children and Adolescents based on DSM-5 (ILF External; Görtz-Dorten et al., 2022) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Therapist judgment: - Evaluation form for VR sessions (adherence, benefits/strengths, risks/obstacles) - Aggressive and social-competent responses in conflict situations of the VR test Patient judgement: - Attractiveness of VR (adapted from Alsem et al., 2021) - Immersion experience (adapted from Schubert et al., 2001 & Verhoef et al., 2022) - Emotional Engagement (adapted from Verhoef et al., 2022) - Ecological validity of VR test situations (adapted from Sargent et al., 2018) | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactAnja Görtz-Dorten
Ausbildungsinstitut für Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychotherapie der Uniklinik Köln (AKiP)
Outcome results
None listed