Effect of a haptic robot-guided cutting guide for bone harvesting from the iliac crest compared with a conventional harvesting technique using a 3D-printed cutting guide - Crossover RCT

Effect of a haptic robot-guided cutting guide for bone harvesting from the iliac crest compared with a conventional harvesting technique using a 3D-printed cutting guide - Crossover RCT - Robo-Cutting Guide Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00031358

Enrollment

Registered

2023-07-26

Start date

2023-07-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Microvascular reconstruction of the viscerocranium

Interventions

Group 1: robot-guided cutting guide / 3d-printed cutting guide Group 2: 3d-printed cutting guide / robot-guided cutting guide

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: medical- and dentistry students in their clinical semesters doctors and dentists in oral-, maxillofacial surgery informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal of participating Left-handedness (due to the experimental design) Experience in using cutting guides for harvesting bone grafts

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Angle of osteotomy deviation in degrees between plan and performance	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Impact of the method on surface deviation between plan and performance measured by Average Hausdorff Distance (AVD) and Hausdorff Distance (HD), flap raising time, and mental workload	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactBehrus Puladi

Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer-, Gesichtschirurgie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen

bpuladi@ukaachen.de+49 241 80 38389

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026