Skip to content

Anatomical Reconstruction following Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Anatomical Reconstruction following Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00031017
Enrollment
119
Registered
2023-02-03
Start date
2023-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Z91.70

Interventions

Group 1: Women who have undergone different types female genital mutilation and were surgically treated with a variety of plastic-reconstructive techniques in our clinic Baseline characteristics such

Sponsors

Luisenhospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All 119 patients who had presented to our department and had subsequently undergone reconstructive surgery between 2014 and 2021 for the treatment of symptomatic genital deformities following FGM/C were retrospectively included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A clinically plausible correlation between physical findings and reported symptoms must be established to provide eligibility for surgical therapy. In cases of suspected psychopathological confounding, surgery was withheld and referral to psychological and/or sexuological counseling was advised.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of symptoms, specifically with regard to dysmenorrhea, dysuria and dyspareunia (pain during menstruation, urination and sexual intercourse): In consideration of possible linguistic and socio-cultural barriers, symptom improvement was determined by a comprehensible, binary questionnaire (yes or no) asking if they suffer from the respective symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dysuria and dyspareunia). Data was collected at baseline (preoperative assessment), at 3-month and 12-months follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of clitoral sensitivity and ability to reach orgasm: We used a single-item questionnaire based on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure the subjective perception of clitoral sensation of our patient population. Clitoral sensation was assessed by local manual stimulation by the examining surgeon, and reported through a numeric scale, ranging from 0 (complete absence of clitoral sensation) to 10 (high sensation and excitability). Patients also reported on their ability to achieve an orgasm during sexual intercourse or masturbation. Data was collected at baseline (preoperative assessment), at 3-month and 12-months follow-up.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDan mon;Masih O'Dey;Kameh Khosh

Luisenhospital;Luisenhospital

dan.odey@luisenhospital.de;masih.kameh-khosh@luisenhospital.de+49 02414142446;+49 02414142446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026