Skip to content

Comparison of the effectiveness of a medium-frequency versus a low-frequency electrical stimulation protocol for wrist extension in stroke patients with arm paresis in terms of efficiency, perceived discomfort, and muscular fatigue

Comparison of the effectiveness of a medium-frequency versus a low-frequency electrical stimulation protocol for wrist extension in stroke patients with arm paresis in terms of efficiency, perceived discomfort, and muscular fatigue

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00030666
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-02-21
Start date
2023-03-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke with arm paresis

Interventions

Group 1: Electrical stimulation of the wrist extensors with a low-frequency stimulation protocol (biphasic, rectangular pulse shape, 50 Hz, pulse time of 500 µs and pulse pause of 20 ms, 20/60/20 ram

Sponsors

Hochschule Trier
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Hemorrhagic or ischemic apoplex, Arm paresis as a result of stroke, Cognitive functions sufficient (understanding of study content, implementing instructions, giving consent) and communication possible, Ability to sit upright and maintain position (chair or wheelchair) for about 75 min

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No movement of the wrist extensors possible (strength grade 0-1 according to Janda), Complaints/movement restrictions in the area of the wrist/elbow/forearm/shoulder (e.g. tendovaginitis, tennis elbow), Contraindications for electrical stimulation according to Wenk (2011)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Stimulation efficiency (quotient of force and stimulation intensity) during each step of a stepwise increase in stimulation intensity protocol

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
induced force during each step of the step protocol, perceived discomfort during each step of the stimulation protocol, muscle fatigue (decrease in induced force during a muscle fatigue protocol)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSarah Tenberg

Hochschule Trier

s.tenberg@hochschule-trier.de+496518103775

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026