Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping versus intracardiac echocardiography for navigation of electrophysiological catheters in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias

Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping versus intracardiac echocardiography for navigation of electrophysiological catheters in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias - ICE vs. 3D EAM for Navigation of EP Catheters

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00030421

Enrollment

100

Registered

2022-10-07

Start date

2020-01-07

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I48.3 I47.1

Interventions

Group 1: This is an observational study within the framework of two established imaging procedures in the catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias. The primary endpoint is the duration of va

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with an indication for ablation therapy for symptomatic supraventricular tachycardias such as typical atrial flutter, AVNRT, etc.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, persons under the age of 18 or persons with psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary endpoint is the duration of different procedural steps while using these two navigation techniques. Different procedure intervals (such as EPU duration, ablation duration and duration of the energy application) are entered in a pseudonymised table after each procedure. Differences in the above mentioned parameters are to be investigated in a pilot study, in which a population of 100 patients (50 patients in each group) is planned for a specific arrhythmia (e.g. typical atrial flutter).The mentioned parameters will be analyzed by means of descriptive statistics after inclusion of 100 patients for a specific arrhythmia.	—

Measure

Time frame

The primary endpoint is the duration of different procedural steps while using these two navigation techniques. Different procedure intervals (such as EPU duration, ablation duration and duration of the energy application) are entered in a pseudonymised table after each procedure. Differences in the above mentioned parameters are to be investigated in a pilot study, in which a population of 100 patients (50 patients in each group) is planned for a specific arrhythmia (e.g. typical atrial flutter).The mentioned parameters will be analyzed by means of descriptive statistics after inclusion of 100 patients for a specific arrhythmia.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Economic aspects in the use of the two navigation techniques.	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactBlerim Luani

Johannes Wesling Universitätsklinikum Minden

bluani77@hotmail.com+4957179053111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026