Skip to content

Evaluation of surface roughness, mechanical characteristics and thickness of directly printed aligners: an in-vivo experiment

Evaluation of surface roughness, mechanical characteristics and thickness of directly printed aligners: an in-vivo experiment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00030417
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-01-23
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthdontic treatment of dental malalignment using clear aligner therapy

Interventions

Group 1: The retrieved aligners from patients undergoing treatment with directly printed aligners Group 2: The retrieved aligners from patients undergoing treatment with conventional aligners (Invisal

Sponsors

Zentrum der Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde (Carolinum) der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 48 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Complete permanent dentition (without aplasies), healthy pardont, probing depth of blow 3 mm, good oral hygiene of gingival and plaque index below or equal to 1, skeletal class I or II malocclusion, mild crowding in the anterior segment of the teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: systematic diseases, use of medications, attachment loss, prothetic restorations in a form of crowns, bridges or partial prosthetics, untreated caries, smoking, pregnancy or breast feeding, history of trauma, CMD, bruxism or parafunction, previous orthodontic treatment, chemotherapy or radiation in the past 6 months, skeletal class III malocclusions, severe crowding, extraction treatment, lack of compliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective is to compare the surface roughness, mechanical characteristics and thickness of direct printed aligners using the TC-85 DAC polymer after a week usage by patients in comparison to the SmartTrack material of Invisalign aligners and conventional in-house aligners.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary objective is to compare surface roughness of direct printed aligners using the TC-85 DAC polymer after a week usage by patients in comparison to the SmartTrack material of Invisalign aligners and conventional in-house aligners..

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactStefan Kopp

Zentrum der Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main

kopp@med.uni-frankfurt.de+49 69 6301 6733

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026