M00-M99
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Rehabilitants with musculoskeletal diseases from two inpatient rehabilitation clinics in Germany are asked about their acceptance of digital rehabilitation aftercare.
Sponsors
Universität zu Lübeck, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 67 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: We include patients receiving a rehabilitation due to a musculoskeletal disease. Patients did not start a rehabilitation aftercare already and were able to complete online questionnaires, if necessary, with telephone support.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: We exclude patients who used or currently use the CASPAR app during aftercare, and patients who did not provide their email address for a follow-up assessment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Actual use; When? 5-week folllow-up, How? Yes/no, Online questionnaire | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Intention to use; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, German and adjusted version of the TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are considered as both dependent and explanatory variables. Perceived usefulness; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Perceived ease of use; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Additional explanatory variables were assessed using modified constructs and items of the TAM3 questionnaire (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008). Functional results; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Support from environment; When? Baseline, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) App-related self-efficacy; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) External requirements; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Enjoyment; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Computer anxiety; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire, adapted from TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008) Perceived risk; When? Baseline, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire (Wu & Wang, 2004) Perceived flexibility; When? Baseline, 5-week follow-up, How? Continuous, 1 to 7 points, Online questionnaire (own development) Affinity for Technology Interaction; When? Baseline, How? Continuous, 1 to 6 points, Online questionnaire, Affinity for Technology Interaction | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactJohanna;Matthias Prehn;Bethge
Universität zu Lübeck, Masterstudiengang Gesundheits- und Versorgungswissenschaften;Universität zu Lübeck, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie
Outcome results
None listed