Skip to content

Evaluation of stepwise PET acquisition compared to continuous acquisition

Evaluation of stepwise PET acquisition compared to continuous acquisition

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00030359
Enrollment
16
Registered
2022-10-17
Start date
2023-05-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C43 C34

Interventions

Group 1: Patients will be examined with an alternative PET-acquisition technique after FDG-PET/CT

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Kliniken am oberen Eselsberg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with melanoma or bronchial carcinoma scheduled for a PET examination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - cardiac pacemaker, insulin pump, hearing aids, implanted electrodes - fixed dental prosthesis - metallic foreign body - extended tattoos - severe claustrophobia - potential or proven pregnancy or lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of image quality between sequential and continuous PET acquisition by two reader and rating on a Likert scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcome

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAmbors Beer

Uniklinik Ulm, Nuklearmedizin

info.nuklearmedizin@uniklinik-ulm.de+4973150061301

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026